The removal of video game time, following fist-fighting, reduces the behavior over time. What type of consequence is this?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $25.99Unlock all

Prepare for the ABA Rocks RBT Exam with flashcards and multiple choice questions with hints and answers explained. Get ready to ace your exam!

Multiple Choice

The removal of video game time, following fist-fighting, reduces the behavior over time. What type of consequence is this?

Explanation:
Removing access to a preferred activity after an unwanted behavior reduces the likelihood of that behavior occurring again. This is negative punishment because a positive consequence (video game time) is taken away to decrease fist-fighting. It isn’t positive punishment, since nothing aversive is added after the behavior. It isn’t negative reinforcement, because the removal of video game time is not used to increase a desirable behavior by removing an aversive stimulus. And it isn’t positive reinforcement, since the outcome does not involve adding a reward to encourage a different behavior.

Removing access to a preferred activity after an unwanted behavior reduces the likelihood of that behavior occurring again. This is negative punishment because a positive consequence (video game time) is taken away to decrease fist-fighting.

It isn’t positive punishment, since nothing aversive is added after the behavior. It isn’t negative reinforcement, because the removal of video game time is not used to increase a desirable behavior by removing an aversive stimulus. And it isn’t positive reinforcement, since the outcome does not involve adding a reward to encourage a different behavior.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy